Recently a Krispy Kreme opened up in Clackamas, Oregon. As several dozen cars waited in the parking lot for the day before the grand opening, a Portland city commissioner arrived at the store. He emerged soon after with a couple boxes of donuts.
This story was originally run in The Oregonian newspaper, but they only archive back 14 days so I can't provide a link. There was no mention of potential impropriety.
My point is this. Krispy Kreme has plans to soon open a store in Portland, but not all the details have been worked out. This particular city commissioner is responsible for working with the chain to work out these details.
Did he gain an advantage, use official priviledge, or accept a gift or gratuity? This was the day before the opening and dozens of customers were waiting outside to puchase, but none were able to. But this city commissioner was able to.
I don't think it matters whether the commissioner paid or not. He still was able to aquire the donuts before the general public and was visiting in an official capacity.
This commissioner is also running for the Mayor's seat.
What is the difference between he and a police officer accepting free coffee, or a gift for a job well done? These are expressly prohibited in our directives. Why are police officers expected to live these rules when our bosses are not?


Reply With Quote
