GTII Threads In New Posts

[seltzer]

Hey, did anyone else notice that GTII threads are back in New Posts?? And, as Butter said, the User Profiles are fixed!! YEAH!! :D

[greenlead]

Yeah, I noticed.

[metallicat]

The jury is still out on whether or not this was an intentional move. The board was updated today, so that may be why the topics are appearing. Don't get your hopes up yet. ;)

[Orleander]

.. Don't get your hopes up yet. ;)

Too late!

[Stump]

Yeah, 'cuz what us rabble say doesn't mean anything.

[Ranger__101]

I to like having those back in the new posts. That way I don't have to dig though several different areas to catch up!

I must say let's leave it the way it is.

[Star]

I to like having those back in the new posts. That way I don't have to dig though several different areas to catch up! I must say let's leave it the way it is.

Me too, Ranger. It seems like there is more participation on the board. I noticed it kind of fell short in the past few weeks. I say keep the family together, as well.

[Jynkxxie]

Yeah, and when you hit "new posts"...there are actually posts there now.

[Orleander]

Yeah!!! The Supporting Members have spoken. Keep it, keep it, keep it!

[Roses]

I, agree that general topics II should be included with new posts.

[txinvestigator1]

Yeah!!! The Supporting Members have spoken. Keep it, keep it, keep it!

So only supporting members should be counted?

[sorrel]

Don't go all soft on us now DC, tell us how you really feel.

LOL, well I have been called worse, then a goofball that is.
There are several different kinds of "supporting" members, that I do agree with.
I do think there is a little room to blow off some steam here and have some fun.
The general topics 2 area seems to fit the bill very well.

Overall though, none of us owns this site, we all are guests here.
Now if Jason would just change the name to Real Police and add in brackets (plus a couple of goofballs) I would be happy......lmao.

[spitfire]

I to like having those back in the new posts. That way I don't have to dig though several different areas to catch up!

I must say let's leave it the way it is.

Agreed. Whether it was an accident or not... yay!

[Orleander]

So only supporting members should be counted?

No, just 8 of the 9 people above my post were supporting members, is all. No, I don't think ONLY supporting members should be counted, but what is wrong with giving the people of this board what they want? Take a poll. If they don't want it, fine. No harm, no foul.

[sparrow803]

If the majority of the LEOs want it, I'm fine with that. But personally I don't think non-LEOs should be voting in how an LE board is going to be set up. This board's really built as an LE resource to allow cops to network. It also has provisions to allow people outside of our field to ask questions and interact, but whereas it's a working tool for those of us in the trade, it's just an on-line playground to the non-cops. And while that's tolerable when kept in proportion, it shouldn't be allowed to interfere with the main function, which is attracting cops and serving as a networking tool for cops.

...............your own personal opinion? or is this the opinion of the owner?