Can any of our LA members confirm this?

[Signal9]

I know people collect guns and such but all it takes is a burglary and then these guns will be used in other crimes. I am not against people carrying responsibly just going nuts with firearms etc. Just my opinion.

Rogerdat,

Think about what you are saying. You are saying that because of a criminals actions (i.e. breaking into a house and stealing guns) we should lose our constitutional rights. This is plain stupid. I shouldn't be allowed to posess guns because A CRIMINAL MIGHT STEAL THEM? How is it logical to take away law abiding citizens constitutional rights because of a criminals actions.

I really wish people would do a little research on the 2nd amendment before discussing it. You need to understand why we have the second amendment.:rolleyes:

[Valor55]

I agree with 12 volt and I also think that there needs to be a limit as to what people posses, I mean what do people need 100's of guns for with high powered rounds etc. I know people collect guns and such but all it takes is a burglary and then these guns will be used in other crimes. I am not against people carrying responsibly just going nuts with firearms etc. Just my opinion.

How many is too many? 2? 5? 20? 40? Who decides? You? John Kerry? Ted *hic* Kennedy?

How about it's none of the government's business what kind or how many guns someone has? California has intentionally created so many anti-gun laws that it is probably impossible for law abiding citizens to have a collection of any kind and be legal. That's onerous and intrusive.

I don't understand why anyone who loves freedom is still in that state. You are out voted and out manuvered by the insane and degenerate.

[TXCharlie]

How many is too many? 2? 5? 20? 40? Who decides? You? John Kerry? Ted *hic* Kennedy?

You obviously have not read the BATF manual... Page 2304, paragraph 678.99.0.876(a) subparagraph (iii) item 44, exhibit C:

"It is deemed by the BATF that you don't need a gun - You'll put your eye out."

[chiefhuntr]

[QUOTE=Rhinoceros;679258]My wife collects fancy little perfume jars from the art deco period. She doesn't evn keep perfume in them. SHould the government take them away?QUOTE]


It is not a problem as the perfume jars are "unloaded" or empty. Now if she were to "load" them, they would be subject to "government take away." :p

[chiefhuntr]

Am I missing something??? Why does the article refer to the person who had their house searched with a lawful warrant as a victim??? Usually they are suspects.

I mean if you don't know the police's probable cause then you would have to assume the police were serving the warrant on a suspect, wouldn't you???

Didn't you know, everyone we arrest is a victim. You take away some drugs from a bad guy, he nolonger has his drugs. That makes him a victim. :rolleyes: