What an IMBECILE!!!! :rolleyes:
"Is it worth having people die for running away, in this situation, because he was growing some pot?" said Judd Golden, chairman of Boulder County's American Civil-Liberties Union (ACLU) chapter.
Yes!
"The risk outweighs any benefit," Golden said. "How did (police officers) operate before they were invented? It seems like there are a lot of other ways to deal with suspects."
They worked harder and got hurt more often!
Boulder County Sheriff Joe Pelle said sometimes suspects die after being taken into custody regardless of how they are apprehended simply due to medical conditions.
Very true. Most agencies require officer to be Tazed before carrying a tazer, how come no officer has died, yet. Tazer International has done extensive tests using an outside testing company with no fatalities. Also several doctors have testifed that a Tazer has not caused a death. There were some that said that it did, but they later recanted their testimonies saying they were pressured or paid by the deffense attorneys (ACLU).
"When there's a tremendous amount of adrenaline involved and when there's been a chase or a fight and particularly when people have certain kinds of drugs in their system, sometimes death will ensue following an apprehension," Pelle said. "It doesn't seem to matter what tool is being used to apprehend them, so we have to be careful about jumping to conclusions."
People have died in handcuffs. We should stop using those. My spotlight might give someone a stroke, we should outlaw those too.
Pelle said he has conducted an in-depth study of Taser usage and found that enforcement agencies nationwide show six severe injuries in nearly 10,000 uses of stun guns, such as Tasers.
Remeber, it's not called non-letha, it's less than lethal.
Golden said the ACLU believes the risk of death to those shot with Tasers is high enough that they should only be used in situations that merit deadly force.
Then why carry a gun?
Tasers use electric energy to temporarily incapacitate potentially dangerous or violent individuals by overriding their central nervous systems. This allows officers to more safely take suspects into custody.
Not true, it effects their neuromuscular system.
Officers of the Boulder Police Department used Tasers 27 times from Jan. 1, 2006 to May 31, 2006. Twenty-one of those uses were to gain compliance and the Taser was not deployed.
See the crap that the ACLU makes us have to document. Our department makes us document everytime we even mention the word "Taser."
Officers deployed Tasers while in direct contact with suspects twice and fired them at a distance four times, resulting in one reported injury.
Brooks said the Boulder Police Department will not review its Taser policy as a result of Wilson's death because the department reviews such policies regularly, most recently on May 1, 2006.
Good for you guys!
Lt. Tim McGraw, spokesperson for the CU Police Department, said CUPD officers have been armed with Tasers for two years and have deployed them 12 times. He said individuals shot with Tasers by the CU Police Department have not suffered injuries as a result.
12 times in a year? We average that in a month. They should look at bigger departments to get a better understanding of how a Taser does not cause death.
"We've found it to be the safest way to take someone into custody," McGraw said. "The Taser provides a momentary level of discomfort to the arrested person with no residual effects."
ACLU, you didn't like the old way either, "comply or I will strike you again."
Pelle said the Boulder County Sheriff's Department may review its Taser-use policies as a result of Wilson's death after it has more information about what happened in this incident.
You have to say that to leave your options open.
"We are always open to new ideas and new concepts," Pelle said. "We'll take the information once we have facts rather than speculation, and we'll act on that."
I think I just said that.
http://www.officer.com/article/artic...on=11&id=32013