Police Jobs
RealPolice Forums
Police Gear
Police Agencies

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 47
  1. #1
    MCCO is offline Senior Member MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all
    Join Date
    Apr 12th, 2005
    Location
    Orange Park Fl.
    Posts
    178

    Question for you LEO's out there on Police Scanners

    How do you all feel about scanners and the general public listening to police calls?

    Do you think all communications should be encrypted?

    I feel that the most sensitive of operations should be encrypted. Drug stings Vice units narcotics ect. But the day to day dispatching should be left "In the clear".

    The percentage of arrests in the US where the arresting officer found a scanner being used in the commision of the crime is so low it doesn't even regester. It is like less than 1% of total arrests. So the argument that criminals are "listening in" really isn't supported by fact.


    What are your thoughts?

  2. #2
    qpd158's Avatar
    qpd158 is online now Veteran Member qpd158 has a reputation beyond repute qpd158 has a reputation beyond repute qpd158 has a reputation beyond repute qpd158 has a reputation beyond repute qpd158 has a reputation beyond repute qpd158 has a reputation beyond repute qpd158 has a reputation beyond repute qpd158 has a reputation beyond repute qpd158 has a reputation beyond repute qpd158 has a reputation beyond repute qpd158 has a reputation beyond repute
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Jan 25th, 2005
    Location
    along the Mighty Mississippi
    Posts
    540
    We rely heavily on MDT for dispatching details. Very little radio traffic anymore on addresses, names unless you check them for dl/wants/warrants etc. It is popular around here for the dopers to possess and utilize scanners. It also pisses them off when you run their name, even when you don't see them, just so that they have to hear their names over the airwaves.

  3. #3
    txinvestigator1's Avatar
    txinvestigator1 is offline what me, worry? txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute
    Supporting Member L4
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Nov 21st, 2001
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    15,675
    Quote Originally Posted by DC Law
    My first thought is that I'd like to know where you got your 1% figure from.

    Second thought is that it's a non-issue as most of the people who really want to know what we're doing are lonely little old ladies who get a thrill out of hearing about crime in the neighborhood and those strange no-friend-having LEO-wannabe kids who fantasize about running out and joining in any nearby police situation.
    And me when I am working in the office. ;)
    "Speed is fine, but accuracy is final" --Bill Jordan

    Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.

  4. #4
    cecilVA's Avatar
    cecilVA is offline Veteran Member cecilVA has a reputation beyond repute cecilVA has a reputation beyond repute cecilVA has a reputation beyond repute cecilVA has a reputation beyond repute cecilVA has a reputation beyond repute cecilVA has a reputation beyond repute cecilVA has a reputation beyond repute cecilVA has a reputation beyond repute cecilVA has a reputation beyond repute cecilVA has a reputation beyond repute cecilVA has a reputation beyond repute
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Jan 16th, 2004
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    2,273
    Quote Originally Posted by txinvestigator1
    And me when I am working in the office. ;)
    So Tex do you fall into the first or second category that DC mentioned? :D
    "Ray, when someone asks you if you're a god, you say YES!"

  5. #5
    txinvestigator1's Avatar
    txinvestigator1 is offline what me, worry? txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute txinvestigator1 has a reputation beyond repute
    Supporting Member L4
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Nov 21st, 2001
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    15,675
    Quote Originally Posted by cecilVA
    So Tex do you fall into the first or second category that DC mentioned? :D
    Take your pick. :p
    "Speed is fine, but accuracy is final" --Bill Jordan

    Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.

  6. #6
    MCCO is offline Senior Member MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all
    Join Date
    Apr 12th, 2005
    Location
    Orange Park Fl.
    Posts
    178
    Well I read the statistic in the local news paper so I am not sure if its entirely accurate. You think its higher? :rolleyes:


    There is a rather large population of people who are in no way old ladies or wanabe's who enjoy listening to police fire ems ect on there scanners. Some people like to be kept in the know and also some like to keep tabs on what there local cops are doing in there neighborhoods.

    Me I HAVE to listen to it as its part of my job as a radio tech. But to some it is a hobby.

    How many of you are aware of the scanner laws in your jurisdiction and do you enforce them? Are you aware of the federal pre exemption in regards to Amature radio operaters and scanners?

    The reason I ask these questions is really to get a sense of how you the LEO's feel about it. I have been reading a lot of posts on other boards I frequent about LEO's sezing equipment and not understanding or not tolerating scanners and such.
    Last edited by MCCO; 04-21-05 at 08:33 AM.

  7. #7
    valycop's Avatar
    valycop is offline Soothsayer of Real Police valycop has disabled reputation
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Feb 10th, 2005
    Location
    Northwestern Virginia
    Posts
    1,738
    The percentage of arrests in the US where the arresting officer found a scanner being used in the commision of the crime is so low it doesn't even regester. It is like less than 1% of total arrests. So the argument that criminals are "listening in" really isn't supported by fact.
    We're finding more and more that the experienced criminals are not only using scanners, but they're stationing lookouts with Family Radio Service walkie-talkies to alert each other to our approach.

    My opinion, if I had my way, all of our way police communication would be encrypted. The general public doesn't need to know what we're doing on a minute by minute basis. If the situation is serious enough and warrants warning the general public then we'll notify local radio stations, go house to house or use the PA systems in our cars. It's amazing how often people will misinterpret what they've heard on a scanner and blow a situation out of proportion to the real incident. This is especially true of the press who catch portions of radio traffic and don't really know the whole story.

    This happened not long ago when there was a private corporate jet that was having engine trouble. It radio'd the air traffic controller that it was going to land at our regional airport. The air traffic controller notified our EMS and us as well as the state police. Well what started out as a small corporate jet grew into a Boeing 737. The end of the story was a safe landing a minor adjustment to the malfunctioning engine and the jet was on it's way again.

    Enough said.
    "In the eyes of a speechless animal, there is a wisdom that only the truly wise can understand"

  8. #8
    Johninaustin's Avatar
    Johninaustin is offline Veteran Member Johninaustin has a reputation beyond repute Johninaustin has a reputation beyond repute Johninaustin has a reputation beyond repute Johninaustin has a reputation beyond repute Johninaustin has a reputation beyond repute Johninaustin has a reputation beyond repute Johninaustin has a reputation beyond repute Johninaustin has a reputation beyond repute Johninaustin has a reputation beyond repute Johninaustin has a reputation beyond repute Johninaustin has a reputation beyond repute
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Aug 27th, 2004
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    3,374
    It's already encrypted. Most scanners won't pick up digital traffic unless you spend $$ for the pricier ones. Most little old ladies are going to be dissapointed, all the really interesting stuff goes over the MDC.

    Why anyone would want to listen to our traffic is beyond me. I can't imagine being THAT bored.:eek:
    Don't try and outweird me, I find weirder things than you in my breakfast burrito.

    fishing (fish-ing)
    1.n.the art of casting,trolling,jigging,or spinning while freezing,sweating,swatting,or swearing.

  9. #9
    MCCO is offline Senior Member MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all
    Join Date
    Apr 12th, 2005
    Location
    Orange Park Fl.
    Posts
    178
    Intresting.

    Just playing devils advocate here so don't think I am a liberal goober ;) (No offence to any liberal goober here).

    What about the people who argue "What do you have to hide"? Police transmissions have been in the clear ever since the 2 way radio was invented. Do the criminals really have an advantage listening in?


    I am on my way to the academy and to be honest I don't know how I feel about the whole issue. I do know that sensitive police activity should be encrypted. But encrypting the entire system so no one can monintor is a bit of a over kill.

    As well the FCC has always made exeptions for news media and a few have taken municipalites to court and won where there local police have shut them out with encryption. The publics right to know and the protection of the police needs to be balanced IMO. I just don't feel that the public should be shut out 100%.

  10. #10
    thelemite's Avatar
    thelemite is offline Dilige et quod vis fac. thelemite has a reputation beyond repute thelemite has a reputation beyond repute thelemite has a reputation beyond repute thelemite has a reputation beyond repute thelemite has a reputation beyond repute thelemite has a reputation beyond repute thelemite has a reputation beyond repute thelemite has a reputation beyond repute thelemite has a reputation beyond repute thelemite has a reputation beyond repute thelemite has a reputation beyond repute
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Apr 13th, 2004
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    213
    If I have to communicate something that I would rather not go over open air, it goes by cell phone. It is unfortunate that I feel that is necessary at times, but at least the option is available. Anyone listening to our communications will generally be bored by all the chronic burgular alarms and turn to another frequency anyway.

  11. #11
    MCCO is offline Senior Member MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all
    Join Date
    Apr 12th, 2005
    Location
    Orange Park Fl.
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by Johninaustin
    It's already encrypted. Most scanners won't pick up digital traffic unless you spend $$ for the pricier ones. Most little old ladies are going to be dissapointed, all the really interesting stuff goes over the MDC.

    Why anyone would want to listen to our traffic is beyond me. I can't imagine being THAT bored.:eek:

    Well the FCC rules state that encrypted siginals can not be monintored by anyone except the intended recipents. So there will never be a scanner that will be able to monintor encrypted siginals it is against FCC regs to do so. Digital is different that encrypted. In fact a digital syetem can be both digital and analog and have encryption built into it. Its all in how you set it up and what system you set up. In fact one of the many issues facing local and county municipilaties is interoperability. How then is one department going to talk to another if one is using encryption and the other is not. Throw in one using a Motorola Type II system and the other using a EDACS system and its next to impossible.

    Its a communication nightmare for Communication Managers like my self who have to find a way to link departments in the same county with each other using different systems.

    But I have gone off on a tagent. Communication interoperability is a hot button topic and is something that will have to evolve over time.
    Last edited by MCCO; 04-21-05 at 09:20 AM.

  12. #12
    MCCO is offline Senior Member MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all
    Join Date
    Apr 12th, 2005
    Location
    Orange Park Fl.
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by thelemite
    If I have to communicate something that I would rather not go over open air, it goes by cell phone. It is unfortunate that I feel that is necessary at times, but at least the option is available. Anyone listening to our communications will generally be bored by all the chronic burgular alarms and turn to another frequency anyway.

    Correct Cell Phones can no longer be monintored. There 100% digital and fully encrypted. It is impossible to track unless you have a VERY expensive service monintor and even then its very hard to do so.

    Nextel is IDEN and can't be monintored either.

    And your right it is borning listening to LEO's on the radio. In fact when the day is done I really don't want to see another radio or hear another cry for service. :p

  13. #13
    MCCO is offline Senior Member MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all MCCO is a name known to all
    Join Date
    Apr 12th, 2005
    Location
    Orange Park Fl.
    Posts
    178
    Sorry to spam my own thread.

    But its intresting talking to you guys about this. I know how other LEO's in my county feel about it but its cool to see how others feel about it.

    :D

  14. #14
    Menace's Avatar
    Menace is offline Desert Rat Menace has a reputation beyond repute Menace has a reputation beyond repute Menace has a reputation beyond repute Menace has a reputation beyond repute Menace has a reputation beyond repute Menace has a reputation beyond repute Menace has a reputation beyond repute Menace has a reputation beyond repute Menace has a reputation beyond repute Menace has a reputation beyond repute Menace has a reputation beyond repute
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    May 1st, 2004
    Location
    Tucson, Az
    Posts
    430
    I would prefer it that all of our commo was 100%shut out from the public. But I'm a paranoid nutball.
    "When faced with a choice between two evils, do the one you've never tried before"

  15. #15
    Group9's Avatar
    Group9 is offline Hurricanes suck! Group9 has a reputation beyond repute Group9 has a reputation beyond repute Group9 has a reputation beyond repute Group9 has a reputation beyond repute Group9 has a reputation beyond repute Group9 has a reputation beyond repute Group9 has a reputation beyond repute Group9 has a reputation beyond repute Group9 has a reputation beyond repute Group9 has a reputation beyond repute Group9 has a reputation beyond repute
    Supporting Member L2
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Oct 25th, 2003
    Location
    Gulf Coast
    Posts
    4,643
    Quote Originally Posted by MCCO
    How do you all feel about scanners and the general public listening to police calls?

    Do you think all communications should be encrypted?

    I feel that the most sensitive of operations should be encrypted. Drug stings Vice units narcotics ect. But the day to day dispatching should be left "In the clear".

    The percentage of arrests in the US where the arresting officer found a scanner being used in the commision of the crime is so low it doesn't even regester. It is like less than 1% of total arrests. So the argument that criminals are "listening in" really isn't supported by fact.


    What are your thoughts?
    I don't know where you get those figures. I would say we find scanners on drug warrants at least 25 per cent of the time. But, we encrypt all of our transmissions anyway, so it doesn't really matter for us.
    "Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt man doing it."

    Old Chinese Proverb

  16. This ad will disappear if you login

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts