One has to remember that human memory is not photographic and is quite subject to abstraction and the need to be interpreted. What one sees, hears, experiences is not instantly stored for a lot of it isn't. One might come across someone who seemed quite coherent for several hours only to ask him about the next day and he has no recall whatsoever of it. Why? How could he be operational and not recall it? Because from the operational stand point, his short term memory was working........but the data never made the transfer into long term memory and that is why he doesn't recall it the next day.
Or what he saw was reinterpreted by him, such as perhaps he saw what he wanted to see or expected to see and that is what he remembers.....but that is not what happened. As a child at an American consulate, I thought I saw a USAF, on the underside of the wing, C-130 take off, but what operations said I probably saw, since we were in a US flight embargo situation, was probably a RSAF C-130. I saw and remembered the letters, the insignias that I had seen for so many years, that I expected to see.
And so forth.
So while not to dash its use entirely, forensic hypnosis should probably be taken with a very big grain of salt.
------------------------------------------
(A hypnotist has been brought in to see if he can get Wojo to remember what the crook yelled, possibly a name, at a hold up. "Wait, I remember now! He said......."Hey! [(It's a cop!) the missing segment] Behind you!", (w,stte), "Barney Miller")


Reply With Quote

