I am 50 years old and currently getting a pension from Minnesota PERA. I want to continue working, preferably in the public sector. Because of the penalty with Minnesota PERA, I am better off selecting a state or federal employer., or at least not a Minnesota PERA contributor. Anyway, as I try to compare and contrast I have a couple of questions:
1) As jobs are compared, if all other factors were the same or very similar, except one had a defined benefit pension, but the other simply had a defined contribution plan, approximately how much more per hour would an employee have to earn at the job with the DC plan vs. the DB plan? And, of course, I realize that is like picking the door or the curtain, since we don't know how long any of us are going to live, each DB and DC plan is different, etc. For the sake of argument, assume whatever the federal plan is for DB plan vs. private sector job with only a 401k plan. (Assume no employer matching for this comparison.)
2) Again, as jobs are compared, if all other factors were the same or very similar, except one has employer medical and dental coverage, but the other is a contract job with no employer medical and dental coverage, approximately how much more per hour would an employee have to earn make them somewhat more comparable? For the sake or argument, assume whatever the federal health plan is for medical and dental coverage here, too.
And, yes I know, this really is like comparing apples to oranges, but I also just don't think it is fair either to say any job with any medical, dental coverage, and defined benefit pension is better than any without. If anybody has any idea of how to best compare these factors, please pass along whatever words of wisdom you might have.


Reply With Quote