
Originally Posted by
JitsuBear
Thanks for the info. yea by my statements i was refering to the fact that people who are a hell of a lot more qualified then others can likley miss out simply becasue they werent "lucky" enough to get through on the phone.
if it was simply put in an app and well pick the best candidates, well then they would have their choice of the most competitive people, thats just a fact. Next round through they should just make people buy Wonka Bars and if you get a Golden Ticket and meet the Minimal Requirements you get the opportunity to apply. I suppose they have their reasons, but I would believe that the only people who Agree with this process are the people who wouldnt stand much of a chance getting into the USMs if they were forced to compete with Everyone, not just the ones who get a seat at these Drive Info Sessions. thanks again for the info. just doesnt make much sense to me

Here's another handy little fact for you: The last time that we did open hiring, it was called racist. I never could find the racism in letting ANYONE (who had 2.5 years of LE, a 4 year degree or a combination of the 2) take the exam, interviewing those that had the highest scores and then hiring those who interviewed best... but that is just me. Then again, we were hired straight to 1811s and my academy class of 48 was comprised of only a couple individuals that had degrees without LE or or no degrees (but extensive military and/or LE). Most had military, degrees AND LE.
The initiatives that followed were supposed to be the answer to our "hiring woes". How about the wonderful co-op program that was little more than a recruitment tool for minority females who recently graduated college and had no experience whatsoever. Shining Star was a noble idea, hiring recently separated military vets, but almost all were lacking degrees.
Now, JitsuBear, you would think that I would agree with your above statement, gathered from your what I gather to be a very limited knowledge of things in the USMS and their hiring. I particularly love how, in all of your expertise, you think that the only people who would agree with this would be those who could not compete, were it to be opened to all applicants. :rolleyes:
You see, while I would like the process to be opened up, I don't completely disagree with the current process. It sucks, having to call or email to get a chance to apply, but it is what it is. We are dealing with constraints set by main Justice. You are eager to chastise the process, based on your erroneous assumptions that less-than-qualified people will be hired. This, admittedly silly 1st step, only means that those that get on the list can apply. There are a lot of other dynamics that come into the process for those that apply, of which you are not privy... and I am not going to bother putting out on a forum.
Those of us in government service don't bother trying to make sense of things. I would rather spend my energy on getting the job done and doing it the best I can... and my colleagues in the hiring process are no different.
...and this is just MY opinion. FWIW (in case you missed it above), I DID compete in an open announcement (something like 15K took the TEA exam that I took), so I think I can compete just fine.
We bring evil things to evil people, kicking in a door near you!
."In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But,
in practice, there is."
- Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut
"The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like
an eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig
was'committed'."
-unknown
Working on a PhD in CQB one doorway at a time.
When the wolf attacks, he will find not all who run with the flock are sheep!