Just a question for those 1811s out there.
A little background on me. I'm a 27 year old police officer in a small city with a BA and a little street experience as a patrolman. In the future, I'm interested in an 1811 spot with DEA, USMS, ATF, or maybe a state gig with the Attorney Generals Office.
In order to be considered for an 1811 spot, in alot of cases one has to have qualifying work experience in addition to a college degree. I understand that I probably would qualify to apply for an 1811 spot.
My question is, in order to be competative for one of these agencies, does one have to have a resume filled with awards, commendations, and huge arrests? Would the average patrolman who does his/her job, works hard and follows the rules be passed over for lack of credentials?
I work at a smaller department with only about 180 officers. Of those 180, I'd say about 30 of them are detectives. All of those who are promoted to detective were "dynamite" as patrol officers. I plan on trying to work as hard as I can to get the gold detective shield, but I know it wouldn't happen overnight, if ever. We have a long list of very qualified officers who have been waiting to become detectives for years, but haven't because of budget and other reasons that are way above my paygrade.
I hope to apply for the 1811 spot within the next year, however, I'd like to get an idea how the BI works. If I don't have a wall full of awards and many pictures of me standing in front of huge amounts of drugs I've seized, will this affect my eligibility? Forgive me if this is too "crystal ball".
I'm just curious to see if others on this board who obatined the 1811 slot with prior LE were all "superstars" at their respective agencies prior to becoming feds. I understand that everyone cannot be a stud. Every organization needs "grunts" to work hard and do what they are told, and at my particular agency, I've taken that role. Any input on this matter would be appreciated.


Reply With Quote
