A question was asked in a recent thread (http://forums.realpolice.net/showthread.php?t=46955) that comes up a LOT from students interested in CJ or newly enrolled in a CJ program:
Questions about "crime scene investigation" and "forensic science" seem to come up a lot from students who regularly watch shows on TV like CSI, Forensic Files, and other related programs on CourtTV and other networks. There are also some common misconceptions made because of these shows (particularly the fictional ones like the 7,000 versions of CSI), so I thought it may be useful to dispell some of these misconceptions for CJ students.I've been looking on the internet looking at forensic science and criminology and crime scene investigation and don't know what would be better for what I'm looking for. I also don't know what I need to do to get a job in one of these fields.
Crime Scene Investigation: On TV, shows like CSI show investigators who go to the crime scene, retrieve evidence, do scientific tests to analyze the evidence and then investigate the crime and witnesses further to get the "bad guy." In large, this is not how it happens in reality. In real life, the evidence RETRIEVAL is generally done by evidence technicians or crime scene technicians. This may be a sworn or non-sworn position, but these individuals only retrieve the evidence at the scene, and perhaps do some initial tests. Once the evidence is collected, they send it off to the local/state (or federal if need be) crime lab for further testing.
The more complex testing is done by forensic scientists. These are actual scientists at the crime lab. In the state of Alabama, the state Department of Forensic Sciences has Forensic Scientists (click here for more info) who ARE POST-certified law enforcement officers (i.e. can make arrests), but this seems to be rarity (most are non-sworn scientists). They do not, however, do the investigative process, as this is done by the detectives and criminal investigators at state, local and federal agencies. On the show CSI, the investigators are shown as being the (1) evidence technician (or retriever), (2) the forensic scientist, and (3) the detective/investigator, and I've yet to see an agency that has a position that fills all three of these roles (although there are some positions that help out with some of the three, none that I've seen do all three on a regular basis). The reason being is that each position requires VERY DIFFERENT training/education.
A degree in Criminal Justice could certainly help someone become a police officer (and thus later on a detective/investigator), but would be useless for a forensic scientist. A forensic scientist will have a degree (and often an advanced degree or doctorate) in Chemistry, Biology, Forensic Science, Pharmacology or other related natural science fields. A degree in Crime Scene Investigation/Technician may be helpful to become an evidence technician if it teaches the proper techniques to retrieve crime scene evidence. However, one must remember that if an evidence technician is a sworn position for a department, the individual filling the position must be a uniformed officer first.
So, the moral of the story is twofold: (1) realize that what you see depicted on TV may be VERY different from reality (I mean seriously... like a DNA test can be given to a crime lab and returned in time for investigators to solve the case in a one-hour window :rolleyes: ), and thus additional research on your part as to what is ACTUALLY available in the career field is often needed, and (2) while certainly a part of the criminal justice system, forensic science is still a field of SCIENCE consisting of scientists, not investigators.
Hope this helps.


Reply With Quote
