Inspectors to move across border

[chewy]

Hey K9 (like that by the way. if I can be a cop I want to be K9), how's it goin? Anyway...I will try to say this as diplomatically as possible...I don't like it. I feel it would be a slap in the face against us. We are our own sovereign nation.

I can see how it may have some good to it though. If you had some guards on our side and we LIKEWISE had some of ours on your side, then it would maybe make border crossing more efficient. Instead of crossing the border and being turned back, one would be turned back before even getting the CHANCE to cross the border. But that won't happen cuz the bridge/tunnel here in Windsor-Detroit would make way less money. And money is the bottom line.

The agreement won't have people on both sides. All inspectional personell would be on one side. The Bridge company doesn't get the money now if someone gets rejected by the US. The toll booths are after we release them. The hopes by doing this is that in six to twenty years (somewhere in there) there would be NO permanant border check points on the northern border. What the two countrys ultimatly want to do is create a North American Border Service (which would look cool on the back of a jacket "NABS". Imagine the headlines "NABS, Nabs 500lbs of Marijuana..." ) which would have people at the southern border then at all seaports and airports throughout Canada and the U.S. Then we would have Border Patrol and roving CBP or NABS personell doing random border check point inspections. This is what they said they wanted to lead to in the long run.

[Frogdiver]

Not to mention the fact that we probably won't have arrest athurity on the other side. What happens if we find something?