Captain Frank Drebin, Police Squad!
EOW 11/28/2010
"Hello. My name is Lieutenant Frank Drebin, Detective Sergeant, Police Squad."
One hopes there is a special place in Hell for the evil people who make, trade, and possess child pornography. Until they get there, we are committed to putting them in jail. -- David Procopio, Massachusetts State Police
Here's an actual examination video of a local RP poster being evaluated by a polygraph after a local shooting. He passed and was no longer a suspect.
Captain Frank Drebin, Police Squad!
EOW 11/28/2010
"Hello. My name is Lieutenant Frank Drebin, Detective Sergeant, Police Squad."
One hopes there is a special place in Hell for the evil people who make, trade, and possess child pornography. Until they get there, we are committed to putting them in jail. -- David Procopio, Massachusetts State Police
Just go in there with your head up, tell the truth, and whatever happens happens.
After I failed a couple I tried to just look at it as another oral interview. If the person(s) doing the interview liked me I'd get hired, if they didn't I wouldn't. Either way, the only thing I could do is tell the truth and be myself.
Cogito ergo summopere periculosus.
Fiat justitia, ruat coelum.
Yes, but were you the SRO (Senior Ranking Officer) of your S.E.R.E. class, as I was?? WOW!! What an enhancement!! LOL I took so many beatings, when I messed up, when any of my American service members messed up, etc.
Great experience tho, wouldn't trade it for the world.
"Some people live an entire lifetime and wonder if they have made a difference in the world. Marines don't have that problem." - Ronald Reagan
Sgt. Ervin Romans (OPD) - EOW March 21, 2009
Polygraphs are skurry. They are supposed to be. It's natural to feel some anxiety because it's a machine and someone's analysis of it's output that determines your fate. I've worked for two departments and it was skurry even the second time when I was already sworn.
^^ +1
I've been through a number of polygraphs. For employment and otherwise. They still freak me out. It isn't the truthfulness of my answers (I have nothing to hide), but it is that guy giving the test. I have run into enough idiots in the world to wonder if Natural Selection still applies as a law. Add that with the fact that Murphy's Law was created with me in mind and I start calculating my odds....why is he looking at me like that?!?!?
AND...I just found out that I am going to be doing one soon as my app rolls along. I'd rather go through 10 Oral Boards.
For me, before there was the Thin Blue Line, there was the Blood Stripe! Semper Fi!
Our fear reminds us that we are not God, our faith reminds us that He is!
**DISCLAIMER** I'm not a current LEO, but have six years experience with two city PD's in NC and TX as a sworn officer. I'm in the process of returning to LEO work ASAP.
Just like any other profession, police work has its share of idiots, lazy bums, and pissed off malcontents. Every cop who read that just now easily thought of one example each from their department.
The polygraph is nothing more than an expensive prop used by the person who is going to interrogate you. If he or she is a skilled and ethical interviewer they are likely to come to the correct conclusion about whether you are lying or being truthful. If they are an idiot they are just as likely to mess it up and take a wild guess. If they are a lazy bum they are not going to bother to go through all the work that goes into a good interview and are going to wind up taking a wild guess. If they are a pissed off malcontent they are going to take it out on you if you do anything to annoy them.
The conclusion that results from a polygraph exam is nothing more than the opinion of the examiner. There is no legitimate "science" behind the measurements of physiological responses during an interrogation. However, many people, including many police administrators, believe a failed polygraph equals a deceptive subject, and a passed polygraph equals a truthful subject.
For pre-employment screening the polygraph should only be used an an interrogation intimidator. If the applicant gets scared by the polygraph and admits to something of a disqualifying nature, great. If there is no disqualifying admission there should be no "result" offered by the examiner that determines if the applicant moves forward or is dropped from the hiring process.
Cogito ergo summopere periculosus.
Fiat justitia, ruat coelum.
Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!!!! It's real and if you lie, they will know and you will go to jail for 90 days and no one will like you any more.
They're a great tool for criminal investigation because there are no real consequences to the person if they fail. There are consequences for job applicants who don't pass.
I've cleared suspects who flunked it horribly and I have more than a few people serving life or otherwise long prison sentences who passed it with flying colors. I've used it a few hundred times in criminal investigations and it's great to open up a "conversation". Beyond that, the science behind it is weak. A sociopath can pass one hands down every time. You can ask them if the sky is green, they can answer yes and appear truthful. Using it to hire doesn't filter them out, in fact it makes them seem to be fine candidates.
The polygraph is horribly abused by some depts., the feds in particular. When my brother was an Army major, he was subjected to one over a security breach. The operator was an idiot and instead of asking only a few questions, they tried to do a full interrogation of him, periodically looking at the chart and accusing him of lying. He finally ripped off the stuff and told them to go to hell and walked out.
Having utilized it so many time, I would never take one for any reason that involved consequences if I failed, especially employment.
Last edited by retdetsgt; 02-04-10 at 12:43 PM.
Apparently, I'm supposed to be more angry about what Mitt Romney does with his money than what Barack & Michelle Obama do with mine
My Little Buddy
Click HERE for a common sense tutorial on posting at RealPolice.net.
DISCLAIMER: The above posting, if in response to a background or hiring question, is not meant to discourage any dreams or ambitions, but instead is a brutally honest opinion based soley on the information provided by the original poster. Please note that your suitability as an applicant is NOT tied in any way with your worth as a person.
For LE employment in AZ, polygraph examination is required. However, "passing" or "failing" is subjective I believe to the BI. Basically, you answer a pre-exam, you are examined, you answer a post exam. The answers, responses and polygraph are interpreted and compared and reported to BI who decides if you "pass".
Ideally, the sociopath is caught at the MMPI portion and deception is caught at the polygraph.
I don't think polygraph results stay with a candidate the same way their answers to questions stay with them. I've not heard of a department that DQ'd someone because of a previous departments polygraph result. But they will DQ if the answers change (i.e. they lied through their own admission). And departments compare answers on applications as well.
Captain Frank Drebin, Police Squad!
EOW 11/28/2010
"Hello. My name is Lieutenant Frank Drebin, Detective Sergeant, Police Squad."
One hopes there is a special place in Hell for the evil people who make, trade, and possess child pornography. Until they get there, we are committed to putting them in jail. -- David Procopio, Massachusetts State Police
Damn Snow, now I have to wait untill Saturday to do my poly.![]()