Police Jobs
RealPolice Forums
Police Gear
Police Agencies

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    unknownuser80 is offline Junior Member unknownuser80 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 14th, 2010
    Posts
    5

    Background Prior Drug Use...

    I am currently attending college for law enforcement but would like to not get in too deep if I cannot pass the background.

    My situation is as follows, when I was 21, I applied for a job at, and took a hair drug screening, they had me start working immediately and terminated me 2 weeks later due to a failed screening. I am now 28 and will be 29-30 before i apply for a job, will this disqualify me from employment.

    I realize this will at the least make getting a job difficult but will it completely disqualify me? I live in minnesota which is often a difficult state for law enforcement jobs.

    Looking for some advice from someone experienced in the backgrounding process.

    Thanks
    Last edited by unknownuser80; 01-15-10 at 09:39 AM.

  2. #2
    acreature's Avatar
    acreature is offline Do work Son! acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Jan 6th, 2004
    Location
    State of Denial
    Posts
    11,850
    Depends on the narcotic, time since last use, honesty and pool of other candidates for same position.

    One can only be so Open Minded before all that mind **** spills out, stains and ruins everything.

  3. #3
    Stub's Avatar
    Stub is offline Headspace & Timing Stub has a reputation beyond repute Stub has a reputation beyond repute Stub has a reputation beyond repute Stub has a reputation beyond repute Stub has a reputation beyond repute Stub has a reputation beyond repute Stub has a reputation beyond repute Stub has a reputation beyond repute Stub has a reputation beyond repute Stub has a reputation beyond repute Stub has a reputation beyond repute
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Jul 19th, 2006
    Location
    Upstate
    Posts
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by unknownuser80 View Post
    I am currently attending college for law enforcement but would like to not get in too deep if I cannot pass the background.

    My situation is as follows, when I was 21, I applied for a job at a goodyear, and took a hair drug screening, they had me start working immediately and terminated me 2 weeks later due to a failed screening. I am now 28 and will be 29-30 before i apply for a job, will this disqualify me from employment.

    I realize this will at the least make getting a job difficult but will it completely disqualify me? I live in minnesota which is often a difficult state for law enforcement jobs.

    Looking for some advice from someone experienced in the backgrounding process.

    Thanks
    Drug use may disqualify you. Misrepresenting your drug use on an employment application may also disqualify you.
    "Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free" -- Ronald Reagan

  4. #4
    unknownuser80 is offline Junior Member unknownuser80 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 14th, 2010
    Posts
    5
    The drug was marijuana. I have several friends that admitted to using marijuana during their background that are current officers, so I don`t believe (at least in the area in which I would apply) would disqualify me. However none of them failed employment drug screens, other than this instance my criminal record is flawless I have never been charged with any crime only received a speeding ticket.

    I just don't want to invest all the time and money into a major in which I am not eligible for hire.

    I have never touched a single drug since this instance. I was young and stupid.

  5. #5
    Sgt. Slaughter's Avatar
    Sgt. Slaughter is offline Veteran Member Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Nov 1st, 2008
    Location
    Wherever I May Roam
    Posts
    4,885
    You weren't "young and stupid." At 21 years of age, you were a stupid adult. Don't try to minimize the choice you made.

    You'll have to ask the department you want to get hired on with. Each one may have different standards than the rest. Those standards MAY change in the next 2 years (becoming stricter) as you're taking classes or they may not. Even they can't predict the future. They'll want to know LOTS more information about your drug history. You didn't smoke marijuana 1 single time to get it in your hair sample.
    Of every one hundred men, ten should not even be here. Eighty are nothing but targets. Nine are real fighters, and we are lucky to have them, for they make the battle. Ah, but the One... One of them is a Warrior... He will bring the others back.

    "Wrong door, buddy!"

    Let no man's ghost say my training failed him.

  6. #6
    unknownuser80 is offline Junior Member unknownuser80 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 14th, 2010
    Posts
    5
    Not attempting to minimize, agree stupid adult. You do however fail a hair screening from ingesting marijuana once, not smoking.

    Is there a way that I can get the requirements to review from a particular law enforcement agency? Can I request the hiring requirements, that would list disqualifications?

  7. #7
    acreature's Avatar
    acreature is offline Do work Son! acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Jan 6th, 2004
    Location
    State of Denial
    Posts
    11,850
    Just as any department would want full details and disclosure from their applicants, we would want same to answer your question as accurately as possible.

    You are spoon feeding us, and that mentality does not bode well for your career choice.

    One can only be so Open Minded before all that mind **** spills out, stains and ruins everything.

  8. #8
    acreature's Avatar
    acreature is offline Do work Son! acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute acreature has a reputation beyond repute
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Jan 6th, 2004
    Location
    State of Denial
    Posts
    11,850
    Quote Originally Posted by unknownuser80 View Post
    Can I request the hiring requirements, that would list disqualifications?
    That would be allowing someone to have the answer key before the test.

    One can only be so Open Minded before all that mind **** spills out, stains and ruins everything.

  9. #9
    Sgt. Slaughter's Avatar
    Sgt. Slaughter is offline Veteran Member Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Nov 1st, 2008
    Location
    Wherever I May Roam
    Posts
    4,885
    Quote Originally Posted by unknownuser80 View Post
    Not attempting to minimize, agree stupid adult. You do however fail a hair screening from ingesting marijuana once, not smoking.
    There are many factors involved in drug testing. Less than 2 years ago I was an administrator involved in the process and I will not argue with you about it.

    Quote Originally Posted by unknownuser80 View Post
    Is there a way that I can get the requirements to review from a particular law enforcement agency? Can I request the hiring requirements, that would list disqualifications?
    Some places have them. Refer to my last answer reference contacting a police department and ASKING them.
    Of every one hundred men, ten should not even be here. Eighty are nothing but targets. Nine are real fighters, and we are lucky to have them, for they make the battle. Ah, but the One... One of them is a Warrior... He will bring the others back.

    "Wrong door, buddy!"

    Let no man's ghost say my training failed him.

  10. #10
    unknownuser80 is offline Junior Member unknownuser80 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 14th, 2010
    Posts
    5
    I just want to clarify that I have complete respect for law enforcement and the individuals that have commented on my post. I was in no way intentionally trying to "spoon feed" or leave key points of my past from the post. I am not trying to justify or minimize the mistakes I have made in the past, I take complete FULL responsibility for my actions.

    I took the advice of contacting a police department I am interested in and spoke with a friend who is a detective and has some experience with prior employment backgrounds. For those that may be in similar situations use of drugs does not disqualify you from becoming a peace office (at least in Minnesota), this does not apply if you have been charged with a crime. These actions however can and likely will make it difficult to obtain a position with a particular agency.

    A list of disqualifications in the state of Minnesota can be found
    by googling Minnesota post board bars to licensure.
    I attempted to post the link but do not have enough posts on this forum.


    Thank you for your comments.

  11. #11
    Sgt. Slaughter's Avatar
    Sgt. Slaughter is offline Veteran Member Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute Sgt. Slaughter has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Nov 1st, 2008
    Location
    Wherever I May Roam
    Posts
    4,885
    Quote Originally Posted by unknownuser80 View Post
    For those that may be in similar situations use of drugs does not disqualify you from becoming a peace office (at least in Minnesota)
    Lest those from Minnesota read this thread and think they can get high on anything and still be a cop, you should post what the actual state requirements are.

    I'm glad you got your answers, though.

    ETA: I looked quickly and didn't see any specific drug prohibitions. Remind me to NOT go to Minnesota!
    Last edited by Sgt. Slaughter; 01-14-10 at 05:43 PM.
    Of every one hundred men, ten should not even be here. Eighty are nothing but targets. Nine are real fighters, and we are lucky to have them, for they make the battle. Ah, but the One... One of them is a Warrior... He will bring the others back.

    "Wrong door, buddy!"

    Let no man's ghost say my training failed him.

  12. #12
    unknownuser80 is offline Junior Member unknownuser80 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 14th, 2010
    Posts
    5
    MINIMUM SELECTION STANDARDS FOR
    PEACE OFFICER LICENSURE


    Minnesota Rules, Chapter 6700.0300, subp. 5(D), requires all students be advised in writing of
    minimum selection standards that must be met to become a licensed peace officer in
    Minnesota. Students are advised of these standards in order to make informed decisions about
    participation in the professional peace officer education program.

    If a student has been convicted of a felony in Minnesota or any other state or federal jurisdiction
    or any of the standards listed below, the student is barred from becoming a licensed peace
    officer in Minnesota.

    The following list of convictions pertains to juveniles tried as an adult or any individual 18 years of
    age or older. A juvenile record does not bar a student from becoming a peace officer in
    Minnesota.

    609.224 Assault in the fifth degree
    609.2242 Domestic Assault
    609.23 Mistreatment of persons confined
    609.231 Mistreatment of residents or patients
    609.2325 Criminal Abuse (vulnerable adult)
    609.233 Criminal Neglect (vulnerable adult)
    609.2335 Financial Exploitation (vulnerable adult)
    609.234 Failure to report (maltreatment of a vulnerable adult under MN §626.557)
    609.324 Other prohibited acts (prostitution related)
    609.465 Presenting false claims
    609.466 Medical assistance fraud
    609.52 Theft (Including petty crimes)
    609.72 Subd. 3 Disorderly conduct (re: vulnerable adult)
    243.166 Registration of predatory offenders
    243.167 Registration under the predatory offender registration law for other offenses


    6700.0700 MINIMUM SELECTION STANDARDS

    Subpart 1. Selection standards. A person eligible to be licensed shall meet the following
    minimum selection standards before being appointed to the position of peace officer. The
    appointing authority may affirm that the applicant has already completed certain of these
    standards, but the affirmation must be documented pursuant to subpart 2.
    A. The applicant shall be a citizen of the United States.
    B. The applicant shall possess a valid Minnesota driver's license; or in case of residency
    therein, a valid driver's license from a contiguous state; or eligibility to obtain either
    license.
    C. The applicant shall complete a comprehensive written application.
    D. The applicant shall submit to a thorough background search, including searches by
    local, state, and federal agencies, to disclose the existence of any criminal record or
    conduct which would adversely affect the performance by the applicant of peace officer
    duties.
    E. The applicant must not be required to register as a predatory offender under
    Minnesota Statutes, section 243.166 or 243.167.
    F. No applicant may be appointed to the position of peace officer who has been
    convicted:
    (1) of a felony in this state or in any other state or federal jurisdiction: (2) of any offense in any other state or federal jurisdiction which would have been
    a felony if committed in Minnesota;
    (3) under Minnesota Statutes, section 609.224, 609.2242, 609.231, 609.2325,
    609.233, 609.2335, 609.234, 609.324, 609.465, 609.466, 609.52, or 609.72,
    subdivision 3; or convicted under any state or federal narcotics or controlled
    substance law irrespective of any proceeding under Minnesota Statutes, section
    152.18, or any similar law of another state or federal law; or
    (4) of any of the crimes listed in this item in another state or federal jurisdiction,
    or under a local ordinance that would be a conviction if committed in Minnesota.
    G. The applicant shall be fingerprinted for the purpose of disclosure of any felony
    convictions. Fingerprint cards shall be forwarded to the appropriate divisions of the
    Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The chief law
    enforcement officer shall immediately notify the board if a previous felony conviction is
    discovered.
    H. A licensed physician or surgeon shall make a thorough medical examination of the
    applicant to determine that the applicant is free from any physical condition which might
    adversely affect the performance of peace officer duties.
    I. An evaluation, including an oral interview, shall be made by a licensed psychologist to
    determine that the applicant is free from any emotional or mental condition which might
    adversely affect the performance of peace officer duties.
    J. The applicant shall pass a job-related examination of the applicant's physical strength
    and agility to demonstrate the possession of physical skills necessary to the
    accomplishment of the duties and functions of a peace officer.
    K. The applicant shall successfully complete an oral examination conducted by or for
    the agency to demonstrate the possession of communication skills necessary to the
    accomplishment of the duties and functions of a peace officer.

    Subp. 2. Documentation. The chief law enforcement officer shall maintain documentation
    necessary to show completion of subpart 1. The chief law enforcement officer is not required to
    obtain documentation for subpart 1, item I, if the applicant completed part 6700.0500, subpart 3.
    The documentation is subject to periodic review by the board, and shall be made available to
    the board at its request.

    Subp. 3. Repealed, 18 SR 1961

    Subp. 4. More rigid standards. An appointing authority may require an applicant to meet more
    rigid standards than those prescribed in this part.



    Rev. (3/02/06)

  13. #13
    DeltaV's Avatar
    DeltaV is offline Veteran Member DeltaV has a reputation beyond repute DeltaV has a reputation beyond repute DeltaV has a reputation beyond repute DeltaV has a reputation beyond repute DeltaV has a reputation beyond repute DeltaV has a reputation beyond repute DeltaV has a reputation beyond repute DeltaV has a reputation beyond repute DeltaV has a reputation beyond repute DeltaV has a reputation beyond repute DeltaV has a reputation beyond repute
    Supporting Member L2
    Supporting Member L4
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Oct 17th, 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,083
    Don't think that just because you meet the minimum standards that you're going to get hired. Applications from people who don't meet the minimum standards aren't even processed and considered, yet only a small percentage of those who DO make it into the hiring process eventually get hired.

    If you used marijuana on anything more than simply an experimental basis, you're going to have great difficulty getting a job in LE.

  14. #14
    Adrenolize's Avatar
    Adrenolize is offline Veteran Member Adrenolize has a reputation beyond repute Adrenolize has a reputation beyond repute Adrenolize has a reputation beyond repute Adrenolize has a reputation beyond repute Adrenolize has a reputation beyond repute Adrenolize has a reputation beyond repute Adrenolize has a reputation beyond repute Adrenolize has a reputation beyond repute Adrenolize has a reputation beyond repute Adrenolize has a reputation beyond repute Adrenolize has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Nov 24th, 2009
    Posts
    576
    Hmm. How about just cutting your hair really short or all off. Then just tell them you smoked a little MJ to calm you down before the Oral Board. I mean, that would be understandable, no?
    For me, before there was the Thin Blue Line, there was the Blood Stripe! Semper Fi!

    Our fear reminds us that we are not God, our faith reminds us that He is!

    **DISCLAIMER** I'm not a current LEO, but have six years experience with two city PD's in NC and TX as a sworn officer. I'm in the process of returning to LEO work ASAP.

  15. This ad will disappear if you login

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts