
Originally Posted by
Odin
In June of 2000, Derrick Evans, a black man, applied to the Dallas Police Department. He stated on his application that he had never been arrested. He was admitted to the academy. While in the academy the DPD learned that he had been arrested for public intoxication. Lying on an application is grounds for immediate dismissal from the academy, and the academy commanders recommended that he be dismissed. A Hispanic commander under the chief and the black Chief of Police overruled, and Evans was allowed to remain in the academy. He performed poorly in the academy and had to be "recycled" through the academy in order to pass.
As a police recruit, while Evans was still in the academy his name came up as a suspect in a murder investigation (the victim was an acquaintance of the recruit's girlfriend and the recruit was placed in the area having a confrontation with the victim on the night of the murder). Homicide investigators and internal affairs investigators had recruit Evans take a polygraph exam (which is standard procedure for any recruit or officer under investigation) and they questioned him about the murder. To the question "Did you kill Simuel Huey, Jr." the officer answered "No" and his answer was found to be "not truthful". However, there was no physical evidence to charge the recruit with in the murder. Investigators recommended that the recruit be terminated. Chief Bolton's staff of black administrators overruled and the recruit was allowed to remain and graduate from the academy. His failed polygraph was common knowledge in the department, a real morale booster for all of the good officers in the department I'm sure.
In the summer of 2003 officer Evans' stepdaughter came home and said that some kids had beat her up. Rather than call a marked unit to meet him there officer Evans rounded up 15 relatives, armed with baseball bats and screwdrivers, and drove to the scene of the alleged fight. Upon arrival, officer Evans, wearing baggy pants, a muscle shirt and his badge around his neck and walking with his pistol in his hand, confronted the crowd. The situation escalated. Officer Evans claims that a 19 year old pointed a gun at him so he fired at the 19 year old several times, striking him once.
A few days later, the Dallas Morning News learned that in addition to his arrest for being drunk and his failing a polygraph that asked him if he committed murder, officer Evans was twice the subject of an emergency restraining order placed on him by a judge when his ex-wife sought relief from his assaults. He failed to mention this in is application according to police officials, and the Dallas police would have the public believe that they were unable to find out this information that the Dallas Morning News discovered using only public records. When the Dallas Morning News confronted the chief with this info the chief ordered officer Evans into an IA meeting, which lasted 14 hours and cost the taxpayers thousands of dollars in overtime, and fired the officer at 6:30am on Saturday. The chief only fired the officer because the paper threatened to run the story and the chief wanted to fire the officer before the story ran. Dallas police claim that they fired Evans for displaying his weapon in a manner that would alarm the public (not for lying on his application, flunking the academy, being a suspect in a murder investigation or wading into a riot and shooting a teenager).
The Chief of Police at the time, Terrell Bolton, and his staff of commanders were black, as was officer Evans.
I'll let you figure out how the applicant overcame these bad background instances to still got the job.
Ain't affirmative action grand?