
Originally Posted by
mcsap
We cannot use a PBT as the sole determiner but it can be used to support our belief. And the fact that they didn't have a bottle of booze ON THEM does not negate the fact that they consumed booze.
For DUI we can require that a person submit to a PBT and a blood test.
Not having a drivers license for 90 days or whatever would not preclude a person from going to college. When people come up with such lame excuses for trying to get out of stuff, I try extra hard to make sure they get everything that is coming to them.
Next thing you know, drunk drivers are going to complain that it will be a hardship for them to lose their license?!!
no kidding? hell, we have to use creative writing just to "try" and get the results of a pbt admitted in a dwi!! lol. i normally write something like "the subject was then given a pbt (.09) to verify what field sobriety tests had already indicated" hopefully the defense will ask what the .09 is for, then he opens the door for me to say, well, thats what he blew.
I do what I can do when I can do it.