
Originally Posted by
burtonsnow2002
So what everyone is telling me is that with the given information:
A partial plate
Make and Model (not 100% sure of)
and a description of the person
It still may be hard to locate the person in question? I understand there are other variables but I really thought it was easier to do, anyways its been a week now with no word so we are just going to trust that this person will eventually get caught in the act somewhere else.
The most likely way to find the suspect in this case is if one of the officers or detectives working the case says something along the lines of, “Oh, that sounds like John Doe’s car, and the description sounds like John Doe, too. He is the suspect in twelve other robberies in that general area.”
It is generally very difficult to locate a suspect based on nothing more than a victim or witness description. Although there are exceptions, most people are not very good observers and will often unintentionally provide vague or even empirically incorrect information.
I don’t know what your description was, and it may have been an awesomely detailed, head-to-toe description that was wonderfully specific and wholly accurate. Or it could have been along the lines of what most people call a “description”, which is usually something like, “White guy, about six feet, kind of skinny. Dark hair, maybe. I don’t remember what he was wearing. I don’t remember any scars or anything. I don’t remember if he wore glasses. I don’t remember if he limped. I don’t remember anything about his voice, or if he spoke with an accent…” You get the point.
I regularly have people who get upset with me because I can’t find their stolen jewelry after a residential burglary. How did they describe the missing items? “Gold ring. Gold necklace. Silver necklace. Tennis bracelet. Diamond ring with a 1-carat diamond on it.” Again, you get the point.
Cogito ergo summopere periculosus.
Fiat justitia, ruat coelum.