Just looking for subjective opinions relative "reserve" police officers.
What do you, as a full-time LEO, think about "Reserve" police officers? (please read entire message before replying)
I'm not interested in hearing about the biggest moron that your department ever hired to help during parades and festivals. I'm talking about competent, able-bodied officers who decide to work as a reserve instead of a full-time officer.
Do they "get in your way"? Do you resent them for "doing your job" or "taking work away from another (potential) full-time officer? If he/she had the same education, background and experience as you, would you consider him/her an "equal", or does that 'Reserve' word in his/her title yank your chain?
I'm a 15 year veteran of Information Technologies (Software Engineer). Comparatively speaking, I make two/three/four times what some full-time LEO's make. However, I'm about half-way finished with my Associates in Criminal Justice / Law Enforcment.
When the time is right, I plan on getting rid of most of my "expensive toys" and going full-time into LE.
Until then, however, I'm planning on joining my local department as a reserve.
In my town, a reserve officer is no different than a full-time officer -- everything is issued/paid for by the department (uniforms/duty gear/gun/ammo/training/etc.), their powers are completely the same (arrest/patrol/etc). When in public, citizens can't tell the difference by looking at one. The primary difference is that reserves only work part time and receive no benefits. Reserves must pass the same MCOLES tests (read/write and physical) to be sworn-in as full-time officers.
I submitted my application and resume last week, and was called within a few days to schedule an interview.
My interview is ... well ... TODAY, actually ...
I'm just looking for some general feedback on the general opinion of full-time officers regarding the COMPETENT and PROFESSIONAL reserve officers in their department.
Thanks in advance.



Reply With Quote
