Point taken. I'll keep that in mind.
It was a veiled apology for posting so (too?) much.
I wouldn't say you're posting "too much" - I might suggest that you proofread what you post a little more before you hit SEND. IMO, I found some material in your other post to be poorly worded, inane, naively assumptive, etc.
I will try to work on that, but I cannot guarantee that I won't post something else that false into those categories. I can only try.
It was a simple statement of my experience. No more, no less. No hidden criticism or agenda.
Ok, but it was a stupid question. Just because YOU haven't heard of it, you think it Doesn't happen? Wouldn't you think it might have happened SOMEWHERE else in the country? And if you thought it might have happened regardless of you hearing about it, why did you bother to ask? Dumb conclusion OR Dumb question - take your pick.
It wasn't a question at all, but a statement.
As stated on the DEA website.
Yeah, that tells me a whole lot... Btw, "inhalant" as referring to a category of drugs commonly abused is WAY DIFFERENT than an "aerosol" or a "pressurized consumer product" which is what you're trying to discuss the legality of - you're ignorantly mixing terms.
http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/concern/inhalants.html
This is a very basic overview put in very simple terms so that people like myself will (hopefully) understand. Aerosols are only one of four categories of inhalants. I am talking about all those categories.
I would appreciate if you could make some specific suggestions (and I'm NOT being snappy). There is a lot of information on the web, but a lot of it is outdated, and even the newer stuff turns out to be plagiarized old information (down to the same typographical and stylistic errors). I'm not writing a paper or anything so I do not intend to spend a gigantic amount of time and effort on researching this.
Socratic learning. If you're not going to put in effort, then I'm not either (which means you're on the verge of being CLICKED).
I certainly appreciate the preparation for law school (should I ever make it there). I do appreciate the time/effort you are putting into this. I came here to learn, not to lecture. I'm sorry if I gave a different impression.
I was mostly interested in how prevalent this problem actually is in law enforcement and what your professional experience with it is. I can read anything I want in books, but I was hoping to hear from actual LEOs here. That's all.
You are. It happens. Next topic.
Umm...You pick one.
I never had any intention of doing it.
I never said you did or do - I said MAYBE you did or your friends did because you made this assumptive statement - "I thought that was odd since at one point it seemed like it was evey kid's favorite past time." Wrong (again).
I said it SEEMED like -- to ME. I didn't say that was indeed the case. How would I know? It's completely subjective. And as you said in a previous post, peoples beliefs/assumptions are largely influenced by the media, and I do remember a time when it SEEMED as if huffing was "everywhere". I am not stating this as fact.
I'll keep looking. I believe you're correct that I am searching for the wrong terms. But I wish they would just refer to the actual law on the can/bottle rather than just putting some ominous warning on it: "Sniff this and bad things may happen and maybe someone somehwere might even somehow punish you."
That's ridiculous. Makes about as much sense as putting a law on a big mac wrapper saying that if you freeze this big mac and then put it into a sock and then hit someone in the head with it, you may be charged with assault with a deadly weapon, etal.
That's not what I meant. I meant that instead of simply saying "Federal law prohibits..." [I'm sorry, but I cannot find a product in my apartment that actually has the warning on it, so I cannot give an accurate quote], it should reference the actual law, i.e. statute/section/paragraph (or whatever the proper terms for this may be) so that people can look up the actual wording rather than just having some generic statement on there without any definitions or explanations. I just think that they should cite the source.
How do you recognize that an inhalant was abused (other than obvious signs such as typical containers)? Does it show up in the blood? Are officers trained to recognize the effects of all the different inhalants?
Google symptoms of inhalant abuse or drug use symptoms or something else like that. We don't have to recognize the difference between sniffing primer or clear coat or even between aqua net and miracle whip...
Fair enough.
I don't. But I cannot imagine anyone between 13 and 21, who is of average intelligence who was raised by humans, and has had average contact with other people and society, not knowing that drinking under 21 is illegal.
Guess what, doesn't matter if they know or not - it's still illegal. Ignorance of a/the law is not an excuse...
I'm aware of that.
I don't. I wrote "many MAY not". It is made pretty clear to kids that "weed is illegal. cocaine is illegal. heroin is illegal." Up until recently, and from my admittedly VERY limited experience and observation, there were no warnings about "nail polish remover is illegal if you sniff it, lighter fluid is illegal, RediWhip is illegal". Hell, mom put it on my birthday cake. How illegal can it be? I bet you could ask random adults on the street if huffing paint thinners was illegal (illegal, not just stupid/dangerous) and most wouldn't know the answer.
Again, it doesn't matter if they know or not. If it's Stupid enough - there's a good chance it might also be illegal. AND, show me the statute(s)/code(s)/law(s) where nail polish, lighter fluid, RediWhip, or some similar product is "ILLEGAL".
I said SNIFFING it is illegal (again not well-worded, I must admit. And my sarcasm doesn't help either).
Admittedly not well-worded. Definitions and regulations appear to be changing constantly, and they certainly vary from state to state, and possibly from municipality to municipality. These are relatively new laws being incorporated into "old" codes. Of course it may just seem to me that way because the information available on the internet isn't terribly reliable. I'm not claiming to have seriously researched this. Again, I'm only interested in personal professional experiences.
It's obvious that you haven't "seriously researched" this from your ignorance. If you want to discuss the topic intelligently, I suggest you DO some "serious research" OR at least stop asking stupid questions and/or making dumb assumptions and erroneous statements.
I didn't so much want to "discuss" the topic, but rather hear from people who have "first-hand" knowledge of the issue. I'm not arrogant enough to think that I could engage in a serious debate with you or any of the LEOs here. I would have liked for you to share your knowledge rather than my posting the limited info that I have. I realize it was a mistake to include anything in my initial post that wasn't a simple question. I shouldn't have included any statements or assumptions or guesses.
I have never inhaled any substance with the intention of getting high (I did once inhale something that wasn't intended to be inhaled in large quantities out of stupidity. Not sure that counts). Have I known people who have? Yes. Did I partake? No. Did I stick around when they got high? No. My parents kept me on a leash too short to hang myself with.
I suspect you are at least 20 years older than me, so A LOT has changed between your youth and mine. Just look at how you guys dressed back then.
I probably AM 20 years older than you BUT, when I was your age, I was smart enough to keep my mouth shut about stuff I knew nothing about, ask intelligent questions, AND I was raised properly enough to respect my elders.