Explosive Breach Devices

[Sbrock]

Brock,

Have you conducted any research regarding the number of children killed or seriously injured by explosive breach tactics? If so, would you mind sharing that information?

Being that this type of breach device is relatively new,(here in the US anyways) I am sure there are no statistics yet, thank God.

And since this discussion has turned out to be pointless (due to the type responses) you win. Most of you have proved that you are nothing but a bunch of Dirty Harry Rambo wannabes, I'll stop harassing you now; HAHAHAHA.

I am going to lower myself to your standards and tell you all to Fukk Off.

And if you were a real officer of the law, why are sitting here flaming me? shouldn't you be out killing something? Practice makes perfect.

[Cat_Doc]

Brock,

Just as I thought, you have no idea at all what you are talking about.

I know you will come in here to continue viewing this thread, so let me tell you what the law enforcement officers are really like.

A few years ago, while I was in homicide, we developed enough information to issue a search warrant for the murder suspect’s residence. Because of the “bad” neighborhood, in a bordering jurisdiction, we were unable to conduct specific intell via neighbors about who all may be in the house. However, we did see young children’s toys in the yard.

The SWAT team of the local jurisdiction agreed to make entry to secure the residence before we processed it. Even though this was a drug related homicide, it was discussed and finally agreed upon that because of the fear of innocent small children in the residence, SWAT would knock and announce, in both English and Spanish, instead of a dynamic entry with flash bangs, window racking, etc.

I stood nearby and heard the announcements, just before multiple shots rang out with two deputies wounded as well as the suspect. There were no children in the house, just the scumbag who shot the deputies.

I had to step over the blood smears of brave law enforcement officers who were dragged out of the house. Blood spilled because these fine men were also fathers and caring individuals who knowingly risked their safety in order to avoid injuring children.

Additionally, your ignorance shines brightly because I was personally standing in stack when detcord was used to take a door off in the early 1990’s so your statement of the devices being new is just like you, full of ****.

Based upon my personal experience I hope you fully understand and don’t mind when I call you out for presenting yourself as an ill-bred, arrogant, self-absorbed pugnacious ******* that has no idea what this job and its modern knights are really all about.

[Insayn]

Those Dallas SWAT guys are idiots! :D
I gave you an answer, its about knowledge, intel and officer safety.

[jeffyc]

1. I pay my taxes
2. A portion of the taxes I pay, pay your salary.
3. Because I pay a portion of your salary, YOU work for ME. (Public Servant)
4. Since you are a Servant of the Public, I should be allowed to scrutinize your
so called "Tactics" used on my fellow citizens.
5. I am not questioning your tactics, I am questioning the results of your tactics.

I want a raise!!!!!!!!!

[Creeker]

"1. I pay my taxes
2. A portion of the taxes I pay, pay your salary.
3. Because I pay a portion of your salary, YOU work for ME. (Public Servant)"

I haven't heard this one in awhile.

Will somebody please give this "Upstanding Cittroll" his nickel back ....?

Problem solved.

I'd think if you worried about child accidental deaths so much, you'd be working to outlaw 5 gallon buckets.