I received a speeding ticket about a decade ago, and it's never stopped bothering me. I'm curious what some professional officers think of it.
I was traveling out of state, in the left lane of a highway, had cruise control set to 63 in a 55. This was typical "with the flow of traffic" speeding. I don't deny for a second that it was a violation.
A police officer pulled up behind me, lights and siren on. Given the situation, I thought it most likely that he was trying to attend to an emergency. As such, I tried to merge into the right lane to let the officer pass but the convoy of trucks in that lane weren't giving way. Instead, I sped up to approximately 70mph for a few seconds, and then merged into a gap in traffic that was ahead of the convoy.
Much to my surprise, it turned out the officer wasn't attending an emergency. He was just planning to ticket me.
My questions: Had you been the officer and been on an emergency response, would you prefer the action that I actually took (merging as quickly and safely as possible) or the action that would've been slightly more law abiding? (staying the same speed or decelerating, and holding you up while trying to merge into a convoy of trucks that were tailgating each other.)
Second, would you have written my ticket as 63 (the speed I was going for myself) or 70 (a speed I achieved solely because I was trying to help an officer reach an emergency without delay.)


Reply With Quote

