This really bugs me even today! Last year around Nov 25th 02' i was stopped by the chief of police in laclede county , mo and he charged me with a dui, dwr, speeding, and imprudent driving. On his report that he made of that night and i recieved a copy of it from my attorney states that on the first report he said that he was doing a normal traffic stop! Now i will admit that i was wrong for what i'm going to tell you next.
The chief found a green leafy substance with odor found on me, i handed him a m.j. pipe with plenty of residue of which he stuck in his pocket. He found a .380 semi-automatic with clip and unloaded in my truck. He also stated from what i am reading right now says, that i was driving in an intoxicating manor.
The second report says that i was traveling at a high rate of speed, when he noticed a vehicle in from of him was nearly hit by my pickup----He looked in his rear view mirror and seen me cross the centerling. Now how could i just be in front of him and then with one glance be behind him, he did not pass me!
Now he did not mention on the second report that he found a green leafy substance or the m.j. pipe with residue that i handed to him of which he had in his pocket.
Allright, now he said i refused to blow, did I--i actually don't remember because, i appologize--i was high. But, i don't remember saying no. Well the paper work here says i said no but, down below it says mark this box if subject refuses, no mark in the box!
I have been found guilty of this charge, a dwi and dwr only! But, my question is also if i was intoxicated that night like Chief Labby says then how come i was released exactly one hour later? There was no bond on me and this officer found drugs on another guy that was in my truck through all of this and Chief Labby let's him go with a warning!
AND I GET FOUND GUILTY OF SOMETHING THAT I AM INNOCENT TO!


Reply With Quote
