
Originally Posted by
BryGuy
The number of years difference between them really is regardless with this. The true issue is there is a MAN asking if it is legal for him to sodomize a BOY! All Americans have the right to live their lives with dignity and pride regardless of their lifestyle, so long as it does not hurt or disrupt the lives of others. Having sex with a BOY, who is barely old enough to drive a car, is not healthy or respectful to the proper mental development of that kid. Perhaps instead of consulting a Police website, try NAMBLA. Or better yet, ask a lawyer (then keep him around, I have a funny feeling you'll be needing one someday!)...
Sodomy? According to who? I don't consider it sodomy, nor does the state of MI.
Shoot, by 17, he's already sexually active, I doubt more sex is going to be detrimental to his mental development. You're going to have to backup that statement with something. Articulate your reasoning here. Most people I know have been sexually active since 17 and I would consider them have "proper mental development."
"The number of years difference between them really is regardless with this."
I know what you were trying to say, but it doesn't make any sense. Maybe the word "irrelevant" will better suit your statement.
Again, I do not agree with his intimate ambitions, and I would hope that the 17 year old has enough sense to not allow a relationship to begin.
I'm curious, would you believe that one's "mental development" is at risk if it were a 24 year old female having consentual sex with a 17 year old boy?
"I suspect the only reason 110 rounds was all that was fired was that's all the ammunition they had,"