Police Jobs
RealPolice Forums
Police Gear
Police Agencies

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Kyra is offline Junior Member Kyra is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    May 4th, 2004
    Posts
    2

    Is it still rape??

    I have a math project. We are on the logic unit and arguing absolute vs. relative truth. The subject of rape came up and I was volunteered to go looking for a law.

    I am in Oregon. Does anyone know if say a 17 year old and a 23 year old were to marry and had sex, would it *legally* be considered rape of any kind? Or does the age law cancel out due to the marriage?

    I know that 17 year olds *can* get married with parental consent (sometimes even without) and that normally there is a 3 year difference in age that is allowed to not be considered rape.

    If anyone knows the answer or could point me in the right direction, that would be great!

    Thanks!

    ~Brenda

  2. #2
    Toeknee112's Avatar
    Toeknee112 is offline A Reserve of One Toeknee112 has a reputation beyond repute Toeknee112 has a reputation beyond repute Toeknee112 has a reputation beyond repute Toeknee112 has a reputation beyond repute Toeknee112 has a reputation beyond repute Toeknee112 has a reputation beyond repute Toeknee112 has a reputation beyond repute Toeknee112 has a reputation beyond repute Toeknee112 has a reputation beyond repute Toeknee112 has a reputation beyond repute Toeknee112 has a reputation beyond repute
    Supporting Member L2
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Jul 18th, 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    2,065
    Uhhh...(((sniff-sniff)))...hmmm...grumble, grumble. Didn't we just recently have a similar question from a first-time Oregonian poster?

  3. #3
    DeputyMadMax's Avatar
    DeputyMadMax is offline Veteran Member DeputyMadMax has a reputation beyond repute DeputyMadMax has a reputation beyond repute DeputyMadMax has a reputation beyond repute DeputyMadMax has a reputation beyond repute DeputyMadMax has a reputation beyond repute DeputyMadMax has a reputation beyond repute DeputyMadMax has a reputation beyond repute DeputyMadMax has a reputation beyond repute DeputyMadMax has a reputation beyond repute DeputyMadMax has a reputation beyond repute DeputyMadMax has a reputation beyond repute
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Aug 9th, 2003
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    306
    Wasn't that an 18 year old male asking about a 15 year old girl?

    Brenda, What you're talking about is statutory rape. Once they were married she would be emancipated and it wouldn't matter what age he is.

    Now if the real question is if someone can still be arrested for rape against their spouse.. The answer would be yes, at least here in Utah. As an example, we charged a man with rape who forcibly sodamized his wife.
    "The answer to this last question will determine
    whether you are drunk or not. Was Mickey Mouse a cat
    or a dog?"

  4. #4
    Scruit is offline Veteran Member Scruit has a reputation beyond repute Scruit has a reputation beyond repute Scruit has a reputation beyond repute Scruit has a reputation beyond repute Scruit has a reputation beyond repute Scruit has a reputation beyond repute Scruit has a reputation beyond repute Scruit has a reputation beyond repute Scruit has a reputation beyond repute Scruit has a reputation beyond repute Scruit has a reputation beyond repute
    Supporting Member L2
    Join Date
    Feb 25th, 2003
    Posts
    2,741
    The law would have to have a specific exlusion for a married woman having sex with her husband when she is otherwise underage.

    What if a woman is married (thereby preventing a statutory rape charge against her older husband) but she has sex with ANOTHER man? Is THAT stat rape? The law has already said she can have sex with her husband...

  5. #5
    Jynkxxie Guest
    Yeah...I think if you were legally allowed to marry at 17...having sex with your husband or wife isn't rape. It is concemating (sp) and sharing the marital act. All depends on when you are legally allowed to get married. And did you do it of free will and intelligence.

    Not a lawyer.

  6. #6
    Supporting Member L4
    Join Date
    Oct 14th, 2003
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    6,580
    I can't tell you about Oregon law, but I can tell you about IN. I think the laws regarding rape are reasonably close from state to state, but i may be wrong. Pretty much, once you get married the statuary rape clause does not apply. At that point, it is simply about whether it was consensual.

    Quote Originally Posted by Indiana Code 35-42-4
    Information Maintained by the Office of Code Revision Indiana Legislative Services Agency
    05/04/2004 10:19:09 PM EST
    IC 35-42-4
    Chapter 4. Sex Crimes

    IC 35-42-4-1
    Rape
    Sec. 1. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), a person who knowingly or intentionally has sexual intercourse with a member of the opposite sex when:
    (1) the other person is compelled by force or imminent threat of force;
    (2) the other person is unaware that the sexual intercourse is occurring; or
    (3) the other person is so mentally disabled or deficient that consent to sexual intercourse cannot be given;
    commits rape, a Class B felony.
    (b) An offense described in subsection (a) is a Class A felony if:
    (1) it is committed by using or threatening the use of deadly force;
    (2) it is committed while armed with a deadly weapon;
    (3) it results in serious bodily injury to a person other than a defendant; or
    (4) the commission of the offense is facilitated by furnishing the victim, without the victim's knowledge, with a drug (as defined in IC 16-42-19-2(1)) or a controlled substance (as defined in IC 35-48-1-9) or knowing that the victim was furnished with the drug or controlled substance without the victim's knowledge.
    As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.2. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.36; P.L.320-1983, SEC.23; P.L.16-1984, SEC.19; P.L.297-1989, SEC.1; P.L.31-1998, SEC.3.

    IC 35-42-4-2
    Criminal deviate conduct
    Sec. 2. (a) A person who knowingly or intentionally causes another person to perform or submit to deviate sexual conduct when:
    (1) the other person is compelled by force or imminent threat of force;
    (2) the other person is unaware that the conduct is occurring; or
    (3) the other person is so mentally disabled or deficient that consent to the conduct cannot be given;
    commits criminal deviate conduct, a Class B felony.
    (b) An offense described in subsection (a) is a Class A felony if:
    (1) it is committed by using or threatening the use of deadly force;
    (2) it is committed while armed with a deadly weapon;
    (3) it results in serious bodily injury to any person other than a defendant; or
    (4) the commission of the offense is facilitated by furnishing the victim, without the victim's knowledge, with a drug (as defined in IC 16-42-19-2(1)) or a controlled substance (as defined in IC 35-48-1-9) or knowing that the victim was furnished with the

    drug or controlled substance without the victim's knowledge.
    As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.2. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.37; P.L.320-1983, SEC.24; P.L.183-1984, SEC.3; P.L.31-1998, SEC.4.

    IC 35-42-4-3
    Child molesting
    Sec. 3. (a) A person who, with a child under fourteen (14) years of age, performs or submits to sexual intercourse or deviate sexual conduct commits child molesting, a Class B felony. However, the offense is a Class A felony if:
    (1) it is committed by a person at least twenty-one (21) years of age;
    (2) it is committed by using or threatening the use of deadly force or while armed with a deadly weapon;
    (3) it results in serious bodily injury; or
    (4) the commission of the offense is facilitated by furnishing the victim, without the victim's knowledge, with a drug (as defined in IC 16-42-19-2(1)) or a controlled substance (as defined in IC 35-48-1-9) or knowing that the victim was furnished with the drug or controlled substance without the victim's knowledge.
    (b) A person who, with a child under fourteen (14) years of age, performs or submits to any fondling or touching, of either the child or the older person, with intent to arouse or to satisfy the sexual desires of either the child or the older person, commits child molesting, a Class C felony. However, the offense is a Class A felony if:
    (1) it is committed by using or threatening the use of deadly force;
    (2) it is committed while armed with a deadly weapon; or
    (3) the commission of the offense is facilitated by furnishing the victim, without the victim's knowledge, with a drug (as defined in IC 16-42-19-2(1)) or a controlled substance (as defined in IC 35-48-1-9) or knowing that the victim was furnished with the drug or controlled substance without the victim's knowledge.
    (c) It is a defense that the accused person reasonably believed that the child was sixteen (16) years of age or older at the time of the conduct.
    As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.2. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.38; Acts 1978, P.L.82, SEC.2; Acts 1981, P.L.301, SEC.1; P.L.79-1994, SEC.12; P.L.33-1996, SEC.8; P.L.216-1996, SEC.18; P.L.31-1998, SEC.5.

    IC 35-42-4-4
    Child exploitation; possession of child pornography; violation classification; exemption; definitions
    (edited for space, you can look it up at AccessIndiana.com)

    IC 35-42-4-5
    Vicarious sexual gratification; sexual conduct in presence of a minor
    (edited for space, you can look it up at AccessIndiana.com)

    IC 35-42-4-7
    Child seduction
    (edited for space, you can look it up at AccessIndiana.com)

    IC 35-42-4-8
    Sexual battery
    Sec. 8. (a) A person who, with intent to arouse or satisfy the person's own sexual desires or the sexual desires of another person, touches another person when that person is:
    (1) compelled to submit to the touching by force or the imminent threat of force; or
    (2) so mentally disabled or deficient that consent to the touching cannot be given;
    commits sexual battery, a Class D felony.
    (b) An offense described in subsection (a) is a Class C felony if:
    (1) it is committed by using or threatening the use of deadly force;
    (2) it is committed while armed with a deadly weapon; or
    (3) the commission of the offense is facilitated by furnishing the victim, without the victim's knowledge, with a drug (as defined in IC 16-42-19-2(1)) or a controlled substance (as defined in IC 35-48-1-9) or knowing that the victim was furnished with the drug or controlled substance without the victim's knowledge.
    As added by P.L.322-1987, SEC.2. Amended by P.L.31-1998, SEC.7.

    IC 35-42-4-9
    Sexual misconduct with a minor
    Sec. 9. (a) A person at least eighteen (18) years of age who, with a child at least fourteen (14) years of age but less than sixteen (16) years of age, performs or submits to sexual intercourse or deviate sexual conduct commits sexual misconduct with a minor, a Class C felony. However, the offense is:
    (1) a Class B felony if it is committed by a person at least twenty-one (21) years of age; and
    (2) a Class A felony if it is committed by using or threatening the use of deadly force, if it is committed while armed with a deadly weapon, if it results in serious bodily injury, or if the commission of the offense is facilitated by furnishing the victim, without the victim's knowledge, with a drug (as defined in IC 16-42-19-2(1)) or a controlled substance (as defined in IC 35-48-1-9) or knowing that the victim was furnished with the drug or controlled substance without the victim's knowledge.
    (b) A person at least eighteen (18) years of age who, with a child at least fourteen (14) years of age but less than sixteen (16) years of age, performs or submits to any fondling or touching, of either the child or the older person, with intent to arouse or to satisfy the sexual desires of either the child or the older person, commits sexual misconduct with a minor, a Class D felony. However, the offense is:
    (1) a Class C felony if it is committed by a person at least twenty-one (21) years of age; and
    (2) a Class B felony if it is committed by using or threatening the use of deadly force, while armed with a deadly weapon, or if the commission of the offense is facilitated by furnishing the victim, without the victim's knowledge, with a drug (as defined in IC 16-42-19-2(1)) or a controlled substance (as defined in IC 35-48-1-9) or knowing that the victim was furnished with the drug or controlled substance without the victim's knowledge.
    (c) It is a defense that the accused person reasonably believed that the child was at least sixteen (16) years of age at the time of the conduct. However, this subsection does not apply to an offense described in subsection (a)(2) or (b)(2).
    (d) It is a defense that the child is or has ever been married. However, this subsection does not apply to an offense described in subsection (a)(2) or (b)(2).
    As added by P.L.79-1994, SEC.15. Amended by P.L.33-1996, SEC.9; P.L.216-1996, SEC.21; P.L.31-1998, SEC.8; P.L.266-2003, SEC.1.

    Indiana: More Pro-Gun Than Texas

  7. #7
    K9 Police's Avatar
    K9 Police is offline You Are Not Your Job K9 Police has a reputation beyond repute K9 Police has a reputation beyond repute K9 Police has a reputation beyond repute K9 Police has a reputation beyond repute K9 Police has a reputation beyond repute K9 Police has a reputation beyond repute K9 Police has a reputation beyond repute K9 Police has a reputation beyond repute K9 Police has a reputation beyond repute K9 Police has a reputation beyond repute K9 Police has a reputation beyond repute
    Supporting Member L2
    Supporting Member L3
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Oct 18th, 2003
    Location
    Twin Cities, MN
    Posts
    592
    Huh; interesting math project.

    K9
    "The difference between the mile and the marathon is the difference between burning your fingers with a match and being slowly roasted over hot coals."
    -Hal Higdon-

    "You have to forget your last marathon before you try another. Your mind can't know what's coming." -Frank Shorter-

  8. #8
    gdowkpc's Avatar
    gdowkpc is offline Maintaining the Vigil gdowkpc has a reputation beyond repute gdowkpc has a reputation beyond repute gdowkpc has a reputation beyond repute gdowkpc has a reputation beyond repute gdowkpc has a reputation beyond repute gdowkpc has a reputation beyond repute gdowkpc has a reputation beyond repute gdowkpc has a reputation beyond repute gdowkpc has a reputation beyond repute gdowkpc has a reputation beyond repute gdowkpc has a reputation beyond repute
    Supporting Member L2
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Mar 8th, 2003
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    2,547
    Kyra,
    I am an Oregon Police Officer. The short and quick answer is that it is NOT rape. This is if you are married and have consensual sex with your spouse (spouses can rape each other). The issue of age is cancelled when the persons are married.

    For your reference, here are the Oregon laws pertaining to your question:

    ----------------------------------------
    163.375 Rape in the first degree. (1) A person who has sexual intercourse with another person commits the crime of rape in the first degree if:
    (a) The victim is subjected to forcible compulsion by the person;
    (b) The victim is under 12 years of age;
    (c) The victim is under 16 years of age and is the person’s sibling, of the whole or half blood, the person’s child or the person’s spouse’s child; or
    (d) The victim is incapable of consent by reason of mental defect, mental incapacitation or physical helplessness.
    (2) Rape in the first degree is a Class A felony.
    -----
    You cannot rape a consenting person over 16 years of age. Within the 'rape' laws, statuatory rape is not present. Statuatory rape is defined here:

    163.435 Contributing to the sexual delinquency of a minor. (1) A person 18 years of age or older commits the crime of contributing to the sexual delinquency of a minor if:
    (a) Being a male, he engages in sexual intercourse with a female under 18 years of age; or
    (b) Being a female, she engages in sexual intercourse with a male under 18 years of age; or
    (c) The person engages in deviate sexual intercourse with another person under 18 years of age or causes that person to engage in deviate sexual intercourse.
    (2) Contributing to the sexual delinquency of a minor is a Class A misdemeanor.

    or:

    163.445 Sexual misconduct. (1) A person commits the crime of sexual misconduct if the person engages in sexual intercourse or deviate sexual intercourse with an unmarried person under 18 years of age.

    or:

    163.415 Sexual abuse in the third degree. (1) A person commits the crime of sexual abuse in the third degree if the person subjects another person to sexual contact and:
    (a) The victim does not consent to the sexual contact; or
    (b) The victim is incapable of consent by reason of being under 18 years of age.
    (2) Sexual abuse in the third degree is a Class A misdemeanor.
    --------------------------------
    However, there are defenses to these laws. The fact that the actors are less than 4 years apart in age or married.
    In time we hate that which we often fear.
    Visit nwham.com for accurate Ham Repeater information.

  9. #9
    Kyra is offline Junior Member Kyra is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    May 4th, 2004
    Posts
    2
    First off... yes, there was another thread about statutory rape from somebody from Oregon... That was how I found this board, actually.

    And second, thank you to everyone who answered my question! It was most helpful. I couldn't for the life of me find the full text of any of the rape laws, all I could find were the law titles. Not too helpful. Maybe I'll have to get me one of those really cool ORS penal code books....

    ~Brenda Ellen

  10. #10
    dragonspider is offline Veteran Member dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Apr 21st, 2004
    Location
    ...with your sister...
    Posts
    505
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyra
    Maybe I'll have to get me one of those really cool ORS penal code books....

    ~Brenda Ellen

    Heh, heh, heh... Hey Beavis.... She just said penal..... ;)

  11. #11
    Chief_Wiggum's Avatar
    Chief_Wiggum is offline Chief Doughnut Tester Chief_Wiggum will become famous soon enough
    Join Date
    Aug 20th, 2003
    Location
    I'm sleeping over at Homer Simpson's house.
    Posts
    142
    Quote Originally Posted by DeputyMadMax
    Now if the real question is if someone can still be arrested for rape against their spouse.. The answer would be yes, at least here in Utah.
    There would be multiple charges huh?
    Trust me, it's not the jeans that make your butt look fat!

  12. #12
    dragonspider is offline Veteran Member dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute dragonspider has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Apr 21st, 2004
    Location
    ...with your sister...
    Posts
    505
    Quote Originally Posted by Chief_Wiggum
    There would be multiple charges huh?
    Bad joke, Chief...Bad Joke!

  13. #13
    Lfpdlieu302's Avatar
    Lfpdlieu302 is offline You talkin to me? Lfpdlieu302 has a reputation beyond repute Lfpdlieu302 has a reputation beyond repute Lfpdlieu302 has a reputation beyond repute Lfpdlieu302 has a reputation beyond repute Lfpdlieu302 has a reputation beyond repute Lfpdlieu302 has a reputation beyond repute Lfpdlieu302 has a reputation beyond repute Lfpdlieu302 has a reputation beyond repute Lfpdlieu302 has a reputation beyond repute Lfpdlieu302 has a reputation beyond repute Lfpdlieu302 has a reputation beyond repute
    Supporting Member L2
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Dec 20th, 2002
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,444
    Quote Originally Posted by Scruit
    The law would have to have a specific exlusion for a married woman having sex with her husband when she is otherwise underage.

    What if a woman is married (thereby preventing a statutory rape charge against her older husband) but she has sex with ANOTHER man? Is THAT stat rape? The law has already said she can have sex with her husband...

    now that is an interesting point scruit! i've never thought of it that way.
    I do what I can do when I can do it.

  14. This ad will disappear if you login

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts